For America’s capitalists, it is the 800 pound, unacknowledged gorilla in the room. China has the most successful economy in the world today. Despite the current worldwide economic meltdown that has caused the worst recession in America since the Great Depression, China has not had a recession. The great engine of the Chinese economy has chugged along, continually churning out the goods that we have all come to rely on for our everyday needs – now that, it seems, almost nothing is made in America anymore. So, does this mean that Communism is superior to Capitalism? (I can almost hear John McCain and Sarah Palin choking at the very thought – not to mention the entire Republican Party. How can we even ask the question, they would say. Isn’t it unAmerican to even ask questions like that? I’m sure it is in Sarah Palin’s world.)
The question, however, is a valid one. What is going on here? If capitalism is such a great economic system and communism is such a vile system why is China on top and not the U.S.? In case you missed it, because the U.S. press tends to ignore economic successes in China, it was announced yesterday that China now has the world’s fastest high speed train. It travels at 380 km/hour (236 mph). Even more notable, China plans to build 42 more high speed rail lines in the next three years, covering 13,000 kilometers of track (about 8,000 miles).
If that isn’t enough, consider this: China is the world leader in Green technology. Even as President Obama is talking about starting a green tech initiative, and even while he is hoping to recharge our economy by major investments in green tech, China is the world’s largest producer of wind turbines, and it is also the world’s largest market for generating power from the wind. It has 10 gigawatts of newly installed wind power generation capacity. So how much wind power generation capacity does the U.S. have? About 1/10 of China’s capacity – not much more than a gigawatt.
China is what the U.S. was. China is the merchant to the world these days. China is the banker to the world too. China has demonstrated capabilities in space that rival the U.S. Apollo program. China recently hosted the Olympic games and put on a show that amazed the world. So – do all of these accomplishments mean that communism is a superior economic system compared to capitalism? Not necessarily. Consider for a moment a much smaller country that also made major economic advances in the past – a country that is primarily Chinese, yet is far from being a communist country. I am referring to Singapore. As small as China is large, Singapore was once a part of Malaysia. An island state, and now an island nation, Singapore was not much more than a port city – a stopover for merchant ships plying the far east trade routes. However, that all changed with the election of former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. Lee took control of Singapore and it’s economy. Far from being a communist, Lee was a capitalist – except that he believed in planning. For Lee, uncontrolled capitalism made no sense. Under his guidance, Singapore’s economy flourished. Singapore is now a major hub for international finance, technology, and tourism. Lee Kuan Yew implemented a carefully drawn plan for economic growth – a plan that included strict controls on business practices (as well as lifestyles).
The lesson that can be drawn from Singapore and China then is not that communism is superior to capitalism, or that capitalism is superior to communism when we are talking about economic systems. Both can produce good results and both can produce disasters. The key to success for both China and Singapore has been intelligent, responsible government. It doesn’t take a lot of thought to realize that intelligent design will always succeed over random chaos. Darwinian economics of the sort advocated by the most right-wing of politicians – every man for himself and let the government just stay out of the way – is a recipe for economic disaster and chaos. The Neanderthal economic doctrines of Bush/Cheney of “just let ‘er rip” led to the greatest financial disaster in eighty years. The lesson we need to learn is that non-functioning, or dysfunctional governments inevitably lead to disaster. Intelligent, thoughtful, responsible governments lead to success. The key is not whether the government is communist or capitalist, the key is whether the people who are in charge have intelligence, integrity, and compassion for the people of the country – all of which qualities were lacking in the Bush years.
We are not out of the woods yet. Just one look at Congress shows the problem we face. Obstructionist Republicans in Congress use every trick that can think of to stymie legislation on almost any topic – except war – they like war. Health care reform that might bring America into the civilized world of the 21st Century is held up so that the Republican cronies in the insurance industry can continue to feed off the people. Never mind that so many people suffer and die without health insurance. Anything for a buck. Obstructionist Republicans create a situation where almost nothing can get done in Congress and the country is unable to move forward on any major initiatives whether they are related to health or the economy. That is the principle difference between China and America.
Once upon a time we had people in Congress that honestly worked for the “good of the country”. Today, the “good of the country” is a joke. It’s not about the country, it’s about power and control and money in your pocket from whichever lobbyist has the most. China is our largest creditor. China is our major supplier of consumer goods. China is growing while we are stagnant. The reason for this is not the “isms” of economic systems; the reason is intelligence and integrity in government – both of which have been in short supply in our nation’s government for far too long.
Hey this is a sweet blog… very similar to mine. My friend and I had a debate on why China did so well. This is an interesting article.
This is an exceptionally stupid article.
How do you expected to be taken seriously by anyone but liberals?
Nice article. Even more embarrassing, but well hidden by the mainstream media, is that the first 30 years of the PRC saw the most dramatic declines in mortality rates and life expectancy in documented history. This in spite of the tragedy of the Great Leap Forward.
The Chinese population nearly doubled under Mao, growing at its most rapid rate in all of history. This in spite of significant declines in fertility during Mao’s time.
Mao (or at least the CCP during Mao’s time) probably saved more lives than any other political regime in all of human history.
An ongoing Stanford study on health improvements under Mao:
http://tinyurl.com/39xow94
Also this Harvard Study suggests that the reason why China’s economic performance is so far ahead of India’s today is because Maoist China prepared an excellent foundation of a healthy and literate (relatively) population for Deng’s reforms to take place (regardless of your view on the merits of those reforms themselves).
“However, the authors note, China’s economy has exploded, expanding by 8.1 percent per capita per year on average between 1980 and 2000, while in the same time period India saw a sustained growth rate in income per capita of 3.6 percent–a rate that, while rapid by the standards of most developing economies, is modest compared to China’s.
What accounts for the difference? Part of the answer, the HSPH team suggests, is that dramatic demographic changes in China began decades before those in India. After 1949, China’s Maoist government invested heavily in basic health care, creating communal village and township clinics for its huge rural population. That system produced enormous improvements in health: From 1952 to 1982, infant mortality in China dropped from 200 to 34 deaths per 1,000 live births. Life expectancy rose from 35 years to 68.”
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/review/rvw_summerfall06/rvwsf06_bloom.html