There’s a word for this: bureaucracy. The U.S. narrowly escaped a devastating airborne disaster on Christmas Day and today President Obama unveiled his plan to assure us that such things won’t happen again. Unfortunately, his plan is a plan “of bureaucrats for bureaucrats”. It preserves the holy pecking order of the government civil service. Information gleaned by operatives in the field is passed up the chain to be reviewed and analyzed by experts. Judgments are made or not made. Alerts are issued or not issued. Nothing has fundamentally changed. The bureaucrats are happy. Order in the office has been preserved.
Consider a hypothetical case: you are in a public building and you see a fire in a corridor. You look around for a fire alarm, but there are none. You look for a fire extinguisher, but there are none. You run to a nearby office to tell someone about the fire, but you are told you have to stand in line if you want to make a report. Fortunately, our real world isn’t like that. Buildings have fire alarms and anyone can pull a fire alarm. The first person who sees a fire can warn everyone and call the fire department at the same time. In the world of the CIA, DIA, DHS, and the unending list of government acronyms and abbreviations, there are no fire alarms. A CIA agent can’t pull one and warn the world about anything. It has to go through the system – a system that demonstrably does not work.
President Obama has issued a stern order: make the bureaucracy work better. Right. This isn’t going to work.
The President said the buck stops with him. That does not help. It might sound good, like in the old Hollywood movies. But it doesn’t help. No organization can be victorious with incompetent people manning critical positions. Imagine that the New York Yankees lost the World Series last year and their manager said, “The buck stops with me. We are not planning to trade anyone. We’ll keep the same team, same positions for next year. I take full responsibility.” Right. That’ll work.
Here is one simple piece of evidence: the father of the man who tried to blow up the plane told the CIA that his son had become radicalized and that he was a threat to the U.S. The CIA person who received this information should have been able to pull the fire alarm. He should have been able to put this man on the Do Not Fly list in a heartbeat – maybe two heartbeats. He should have been able to put this man on a bunch of other lists too, but he couldn’t. That’s because our anti-terrorism system is a gigantic bureaucracy. It can never be successful fighting an agile enemy like Al Qaeda. President Obama does not understand that. Neither does anyone else in the self-sustaining bureaucracy of the bloated U.S. government.
Meanwhile, it seems that the facts surrounding the whole underpants bomber incident are morphing as the government bureaucracy passes the papers back and forth from desk to desk. Take a look at the official accounting of what happened on the plane. This was published today, just a few hours ago. It says that after the terrorist failed to set off the bomb that he was restrained by the flight crew until the plane landed. Gee, that’s odd. I thought I had heard that this Dutch guy had leaped over four seats and tackled the terrorist and put out the fire with his bare hands and that everyone on the plane was cheering for him and calling him a hero. At least that’s what it said in the Washington Post a couple of days after the incident. So what ever happened to good old Jasper Schuringa, the guy who saved everyone? Why has President Obama studiously ignored him? No medals for heroism? No key to the city of Detroit from the Mayor? Nothing? Not even a thank you? Are we too embarrassed to admit that the plane was saved by a Dutch passenger and that if it wasn’t for him almost 300 people would have died? So, officially, Jasper doesn’t exist anymore and it was the flight crew (the stewardesses?) who saved everyone?
The problem with the President’s approach is that it is the approach of a politician and a bureaucrat to a practical issue. The bigger problem is that the President doesn’t realize that that is a problem. The thing is this: the system in place is horribly flawed. It didn’t work. The system did not work and the people in the system who might have tried to override the system did not do so. These people are at fault. These people are the only ones who could have saved the day because the system, demonstrably, does not work. They failed. They should be replaced with people who are not afraid of taking decisive action. Instead the President has chosen to protect these failures in our system. He says the buck stops with him. He doesn’t want to blame anyone. Fair enough, President Obama, if that is the best you can do then maybe it is time for you to step down. We don’t need a manager who can’t make the tough decisions, we don’t need Generals who deal in warmth and platitudes. We need a hero who can cut the Gordian knot of our vast, and hamstrung, homeland security system and get the job done. Many of us thought that you were that hero. Now, I’m not so sure. My sword-wielding hero is looking more and more like an average politician. (Let’s not even get into the health thing.)
The answer to the murderous terrorism of Al Qaeda will never, ever be found in protecting incompetent civil servants or in papering over the byzantine workings of Washington bureaucrats. Don’t we all know that? Mr. President, don’t you know that?
I know, Mr. President, that you are fond of quoting President Truman when you say: “The buck stops here”, but Mr. President, you need to make major structural changes in our homeland security system. The system does not work well enough. Surely, you can see that. If you would just rather not get entangled in such a messy affair, perhaps you might also ponder another one of President Truman’s quotes: “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen”.
[The system does not work well enough. ]
Isn’t that what he said?
I think we are all agreed (with the possible exception of Janet Napolitano) that the system failed. My concern is that the President is not taking drastic enough steps to ensure that the same sort of problem won’t happen again.