Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Health Insurance’

Emotions have run high on both sides of the issue.  Is access to health care a right, a privilege, or a commodity?  The answer, it seems, depends upon where you stand.  Today, as the U.S. Congress continues to thrash through the process of considering the health care bill, accusations fly from both sides, with Senator Joe Lieberman caught in no man’s land, trying to please both sides but pleasing no one – an army of one.  The left-most side of the debate has already turned on their leader, President Obama, declaring that he has misled, misdirected, and misfired.  Dire predictions abound about 2010 and 2012.  On the extreme right, Republicans chortle with glee, knowing they have stymied a process that might have led to low cost health care for most Americans.  It’s hard not to be emotional about this whether one is on the left or the right. Health, after all, can be an emotional issue. But, then again, so is money.

There can be little doubt that we are a nation divided on this issue. There may be a majority of people who want to change the present health care system. There may be a majority who favor a public option or expanded Medicare or some other version of a government supervised health plan. But it apparently isn’t a two-thirds majority or a three-quarters majority. And that is the problem for this Bill.  Our Constitution was written to ensure that the majority rules, but not the simple majority.  The way the system is supposed to work is that 60% of the people (i.e. 60% of the Senators who represent the people) can make laws – but 51% just isn’t enough. There are not 60 Senators who want this health care bill.  It is that simple. It also seems that there are not 60% of the people who want it either – maybe 55%, maybe 59%, but it doesn’t look like 60%. So, it’s not going to happen – at least not in its present form.  That is the way our government works – that is who we are.

The question we need to ask is this: what does this say about the American people? Somewhere around 30% of the people don’t have and can’t afford health insurance.  Many people go without critical medical care because they can’t pay for it.  Many people die because they can’t pay for the medical care they need. We all know that. It also seems that pretty close to half of us are OK with that too.

It’s just who we are.

We Americans like to say that we believe in freedom – in many ways that belief defines the essence of America: freedom to be what you want, do what you want, say what you want. It is also the freedom to not do things, to not help someone, to not pay someone else’s bills, to not take care of strangers. It is the freedom to look the other way.  We do that all the time.  Many people may have forgotten by now, but there  was a tragic case of murder that occurred in New York City in 1964. A young woman named Kitty Genovese was stabbed to death at the entrance to her apartment building. She screamed that she was dying. A lot of people watched. No one helped.  A few years ago New Orleans was inundated by Hurricane Katrina.  President Bush flew over the city and looked out the window of his airplane at the drowning city as he flew by. He didn’t help. The U.S. government didn’t help. The people drowned.

It’s just who we are.

It is indeed ironic that it is the Republican Party that has led the fight against health care. It’s ironic because so many Republicans are staunch “Christians”. Yet, standing by and watching people suffer and die is the opposite of Christianity, isn’t it? Isn’t that a value more to be attributed to the Roman Empire where people were thrown to the lions just for fun? I must admit, I don’t understand the mental gymnastics that people have to go through in order to call themselves Christian and at the same time vehemently and violently oppose health care for the sick and dying people of America.

It’s just who we are.

In the end though, we have to recognize one truth.  Regardless of how strongly we feel about this issue, we as a people, have an agreed upon method for creating rules. We have an organization we call Congress that makes the rules on our behalf. The process is complex and involves a lot of horsetrading, money changing hands, posturing, threatening, and cajoling. Money counts in our system. Money buys influence in our system.  The average citizen’s only voice is his single vote in the elections. We voted. There is now a majority of Democrats in the Senate, but not an overwhelming majority. We made it that way.  We could change the system. We could eliminate lobbyists and payoffs.  We could eliminate the deal-making and the lying. But we don’t.

It’s just who we are.

In the end, whether a watered-down health care bill passes or it doesn’t, it is because this is what we, as a people, voted for.  We have this form of government because we want it and we don’t want to change it.  If we don’t choose to provide health care for the poor and unfortunate people of America it is simply because we don’t want to do so. That’s what this all means.  It isn’t President Obama’s fault. It isn’t Joe Lieberman’s fault.

It’s just who we are.

Read Full Post »

In many of America’s large cities there are tall skyscrapers, and if you look at who owns the tallest of the skyscrapers you will often find that they are owned either by a major bank or a major insurance company.  If you care to think about that for a few moments I’m pretty sure you’ll see that there is the message there.  You can get the same message by noting that the tallest skyscrapers are never owned by shoe manufacturers, food companies, or clothing companies. Some types of businesses just make a lot more profit than others – the top two seem to be banks and insurance companies. Which brings me to the “public option”.

The recent economic catastrophe was essentially caused by the banks in those big, tall skyscrapers making really bad bets, i.e. loaning money for real estate loans that would never be repaid. In the end the solution our representatives in DC came to was for the government, i.e. you and me, to absorb these losses, give the banks a bunch of money and set them back up in their chairs at the financial craps table.  Some have already paid back the loan you and I gave them and some haven’t. So, in a way we sort of own those banks that haven’t repaid the loan we made to them. Of course it is these banks who essentially own our houses because they gave us a loan to buy them and we haven’t paid that off yet. It’s all sort of circular isn’t it? Sort of hard to figure out who ultimately really owns what and who owes what to whom.  The key though seems to be that the banks have to stay in business, so you really do have to pay your mortgage to the bank and you really do have to pay your taxes in order for the government to pay for the loans we made to the banks. The point is this: you have to pay.

So what does this have to do with health insurance? Well, insurance is a lot like banking.  The health insurance company bets that you’ll be healthy and you bet that you won’t.  Both the banking and the insurance industry rely on making good bets. However, the health insurance industry has one great advantage over the banking industry. With insurance you only pay out a bunch of money when something bad happens to the your health – meanwhile you keep paying the insurance company a lot of money. In mortgage banking it’s sort of the opposite.  The bank pays out a big lump sum up front and then collects it back – multiplied by a factor of four or five – over 30 years. The bank is taking a big risk though because you might not pay them back. It would seem that the insurance companies are also taking a big risk too because you might get a catastrophic disease.  So isn’t it all sort of the same? I could be, but it isn’t. The insurance companies have learned about a thing called denial of benefits – it’s all in the fine print. Basically, a lot of them don’t pay off when a catastrophe happens.  They manage to find a pre-existing condition or some other excuse to disqualify you.  So, they make out like bandits and build big skyscrapers. But don’t feel too bad for the banks, because they have an out too: if you don’t pay your mortgage they just grab your house and sell it. Then they take their big profits and build big skyscrapers.

So what does this have to do with a Public Option? The Public Option for insurance essentially makes the government an insurance company – which is to say that we, the taxpayers, are insuring ourselves with all the money we put in our tax dollars pot in DC.  The government makes no profit – and why would it? If we are the government then profiting from ourselves would just be like taking money out of one pocket and putting it in another. A government-run insurance option is essentially non-profit insurance for everyone. It is cheap and efficient and people don’t get denied coverage just because they got sick.

So why don’t we have a banking public option? Good idea. It’s because the banking lobby is too strong and they have paid off too many people in our government. The best way to run a bank is to make it government-run and non-profit. At least that is the best way for the taxpayers; however, you probably wouldn’t have so many skyscrapers anymore. We are a long way away from the government running our banking system – for the time being our government would rather just use our money to provide the banks with multi-billion dollar loans. But perhaps after our next economic meltdown (and it will come, don’t worry, all of the factors that caused the past one and the one that caused the Great Depression before it are still in place) maybe, just maybe, the government at that future time will have the courage and insight to suggest a public option for banks.

Meanwhile, it looks like the citizens of America may soon have to choose whether they want to buy expensive insurance from companies that build big skyscrapers with their profits when they don’t pay off on their policies, or will they choose to buy low-cost health insurance backed up by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government?  I have a feeling there is going to be a rush to buy the public option. Meanwhile, the insurance companies might start considering whether they could convert their posh offices into city apartments and rent them out, since they probably won’t be needing all that office space much longer.

Read Full Post »

The barons of American industry discovered long ago that they could get people in other, less well off, countries to do factory work for less money than what Americans wanted for pay. It all started with the outsourcing of American jobs within the country itself. Good paying jobs in the textile and other industries migrated from the industrialized north to the south.  These factory owners made a fortune by paying the Americans in the south much less than they had been paying those in the north.  It didn’t take too long before the owners of the businesses noticed that they could get even cheaper labor a little further south – and a lot of jobs went to Mexico. Now, it’s hard to find any items of clothing that carry the label Made in USA.  It turns out that even the Mexicans are now feeling the bite of low cost competition and today, when you buy any item of clothing, you could just as easily see a tag that says Made in India, or China, or Egypt or almost anywhere – although I have yet to see a tag that says Made by Eskimos in the Frozen North.

But, as they say, it is an ill wind that blows no one any good.  Or, to perhaps paraphrase – sort of – what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.  It turns out that outsourcing can help not only the fat cats who own our big businesses, it can also help the little guy who has to buy their stuff.  One prime example is that we are able to outsource our selection of automobiles.  We can buy foreign made cars instead of American made cars – and we do.  The American consumer has pretty much decided that they get a better value by buying Japanese or European made cars instead of American made cars.  Of course the American car manufacturers could give us better value than they do, but they don’t.  They choose not to. So we have the ability to choose something else. Most of us happily outsource our automobile choices to other countries.

Well then.  If we can outsource the purchase of cars, and lots of other stuff to China, India, Japan, Germany and so forth, why can’t we buy our health insurance from foreign countries too?  After all, a health insurance policy is nothing more than a sort of reverse lottery.  You get money, but you would probably rather not have won this sort of lottery, because it means you are sick.  The more money you win, the sicker you are.  But my point is that this is just a really big gambling game, and the boys who run the health lottery in the U.S. make big bucks in this game.  Essentially you pay a lot more into the pot, via your bets (i.e. your policy premiums), than you ever collect (on the average).  The insurance companies score!  They take in a lot more money that they pay out. (Ask yourself this:  how many health insurance companies have failed or needed a government bailout during the Great Recession?) The question we need to ask is this: how much do our U.S. insurance companies really compete with each other? Could their idea of competition be sort of the same as how the American car companies compete against each other?

What would happen if we let Chinese companies provide our health insurance? If there is one thing I have noted about the Chinese I have met throughout the world, it is this: they love to gamble.  My guess is that they would love to be in the insurance/health-gambling business.  They would undercut the absolute Hell out of the U.S. insurance industry, but they would also pay off on their claims because they are also excellent businessmen.  They know they need to keep satisfied customers.  My guess is that India could be a good source of health insurance too.  Another great source might be Ireland, a place where bookmaking is entirely legal and companies like Paddy Power will take a bet on anything.  It could even rejuvenate the fading Celtic Tiger.  If there is one thing Paddy Power knows how to do, it’s calculate the odds.  And they always pay off too.  There’s no denial of claims from Paddy Power.  You score, you win.  They pay.  No questions asked.  That’s the way insurance should be.

So, while we are thrashing about and wringing our hands about a Public Option, and how it will generate competition for the fat cat health insurance industry, maybe we should generate some real competition.  Let’s allow the outsourcing of health insurance to foreign companies and open up the health insurance business to the world. How about some real competition?  Then maybe we’ll see who the real Capitalists of the world are. Is it the Americans, the Irish, the Indians, the Chinese or someone else?

Guess who my money’s on.

Read Full Post »

It was only a week or two ago that the Obama administration was letting it be known that their plan for a Public Option was, in itself, an option.  Maybe a co-op sort of health plan thing would be just as good, they were saying.  They were flexible. Let’s just all work together and get something done was the approach.  The Republican Party gave its customary reply: NOT ONLY NO, BUT HELL NO!  They’re not interested in public options, private options, co-ops, or anything else for that matter that changes anything about American health care in any way. I think they’ve made their point.  They don’t want to play.  It now appears that President Obama also has gotten the message and now the message from the White House has also become clearer: the Public Option was never really off the table!!  It has been part of the plan all along and will continue to be so.  It seems the gloves have come off.

OK.  That’s good to know, because now we can really start to understand what all the Republican bluster has been all about, and we can also start to understand why the Democrats are so fervently in favor of a Public Option.  And, as part of our examination of the Public Option we can also understand why one man’s meat (or panacea, in this case) can be another man’s poison (or poison pill, to continue the analogy).  The Public Option has the potential to cut both ways.  Here’s why:

First, for the 50,000,000 Americans who don’t have any health insurance at all ( a fact that ought to qualify the U.S. for third world country status, except that most third world countries probably have a better record – so maybe we should be looking at fourth world status) the Public Option will literally be a life saver.  People who cannot afford the current high prices for insurance or who can’t get insurance because of some pre-existing condition (insurance companies really only want to insure people who won’t need to use their insurance – hey, it’s a business.) will finally be able to get treated for life threatening illnesses instead of dying from them.  The Republican Party is against this Public Option because it’s not a money maker for private business. In fact it could turn out to be a truly massive money loser.

That’s where we come to the part of the Public Option that is a poison pill.  It may well be the ultimate poison for the medical insurance industry. In one of his town meetings, President Obama was asked how the private health insurance companies could compete against a government private option, since the government is a non-profit organization (at least so far) and therefore its insurance rates would be far lower than those offered by the private insurers.  (The massive difference in costs to the consumer being due to the massive profits the insurance companies currently make from premiums and denial of coverage.)

President Obama was quick to point out that private industry can indeed successfully compete against the government, and he gave the example of how well Fedex and UPS are doing financially while the U.S. Postal Service is pretty much on the ropes.  You might note that the President neglected to say that he was comparing apples and oranges and that’s why his example worked so well.  Fedex and UPS deliver mostly high priority packages and some high priority letters.  The cost to the sender of these items is high, but people are willing to pay when it “absolutely, positively has to get there overnight”.  The Post Office, on the other hand, delivers letter and package mail to everyone in the country who has a mailbox, and they come by your house every day whether they have mail for you or not because that is their route. While doing this they only charge 10% or less of what Fedex and UPS charge per item.  Fedex and UPS are successful, not because they compete with the Post Office, but because they don’t compete with the Post Office.  They are successful because they offer a service that the Post Office doesn’t.  (And believe me, Express Mail does not compete with Fedex or UPS.)

But what about the Public Option? Will the Federal Government be offering a plan that directly competes with private insurers?  You betcha.  And that, my friends is the poison pill I was talking about.  This wonderful idea of providing low cost insurance to all comers is a great idea for all Americans, but it is death to the private insurance industry.  Who in their right mind would pay a small fortune for private insurance when you can get the same coverage from the government for a fraction of the cost?  This, of course, is the great fear of the Republican Party and their rich friends.  Cue the rumors about Socialism, Death Panels, Fascism, Communism, European Style government, Canadian style medicine, long waits for treatment, low quality treatment, free medical care for illegal immigrants, the end of the pharmaceutical industry, Martian landings, tsunamis, earthquakes, and the loss of freedom for all Americans.  You have to hand it to the Republicans.  They have great imaginations and they really know how to stir up their base with a few key phrases or words.

The simple fact is this: a Public Option is a great idea for most people.  It lowers the cost of insurance and provides insurance for everyone.  Ultimately, there is more business for the medical industry – if not for the medical insurance industry.  We become a healthier nation – except for the private health insurance companies who eventually go extinct, because eventually everyone will choose the Public Option.  One man’s panacea is another man’s poison pill; it’s as simple as that and that is what all the commotion is about.  The Democrats are on the side of the vast majority of the American people and the Republicans are on the side of the big, profit-making businesses.  That isn’t news, that’s the way it’s always been.

The real question is this: will the Republican members of Congress stick to the cause of their masters in the insurance industry and vote against health care reform, thus risking catastrophic losses in the next election, or will they cave in and vote for it and thus against the very people who contribute so much money to them?

What would Sarah Palin do?

Read Full Post »

It’s been a long time since I’ve seen the American people so fired up – at least a significant portion anyway.  The town hall meetings that are being conducted are being invaded by coordinated groups of Republican protesters who clearly, desperately, believe that health care reform will bring about the destruction of the American way of life.  I don’t think I’ve have seen this much emotion from the American public since the Vietnam War protests many years ago.  Somehow though, I think this is a different crowd.  This time it is the people we usually call “conservatives” who are ranting and raving in the streets.  The question we should be asking ourselves is: why?  Why this huge disconnect among the citizens of the same country?  Is it that one group just doesn’t have the power of deductive reasoning?  Is it because one group has swallowed a bucket load of disinformation while the other group is totally well informed? Or is it just a fundamental difference in philosophy and  beliefs?

There are few Americans who would claim that citizens of this country are not entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  These words are embodied in our Declaration of Independence and provide part of our fundamental understanding of who we are, even though they are not incorporated in the Constitution.  So, from the standpoint of philosophy, doesn’t it make sense to say that if we have a right to life, then we also have a right to health care?  Because in order to live, everyone needs health care at some time in their lives.  To deny health care is to deny life, and to deny someone the right to life, by definition, makes one un-American.  Simple, right?  Apparently not.

The fundamental issue that is at the bottom of all this is the burning question: who is going to pay?  Do you really expect me to pay for your health care – from my tax dollars?  Hell no – I want a system where I don’t pay for your health care – I want private insurance.  You pay for your own health care.  That’s what the opponents say.  Uh…wait a minute. Isn’t insurance effectively the same thing as taxes? I mean we all put money in a pot – either a public or a private pot – and then those who need the money for health care get it from that pot. If you don’t get sick, you don’t get the money.  Isn’t it, from the financial viewpoint anyway, pretty much the same whether you buy insurance or use tax dollars to pay your medical bills? Either way, you are going to pay.

Oh, OK.  But what about being treated by the doctor you trust?  Doesn’t insurance mean you can choose your own doctor while using tax dollars means that some civil servant is going to decide on your health care treatment?  It seems to me that this is a major sticking point. And I can understand that.  I’ve had more than enough contact with civil servants and, like most Americans, I hold the vast majority of them in very low esteem.  I think my dog has more brains than most of them, particularly the ones employed by the Federal government, – but don’t get me started.   On the other hand, the major insurance companies also make decisions on heath care treatments, and these decisions are made by the bean counters and administrative people at those for-profit companies, so even though your doctor might recommend a certain treatment, your insurance company might say they won’t pay for it.  It’s not so much that the insurance company execs are dumb (like the civil servants) it’s rather that they are out to make a buck (yours that is) and they are not in business to simply use your premiums to pay for your medical needs – after all they do need to make a fat profit, you know.

It now seems that we have moved beyond rational discussion of the actual issues into those that are much more fun to talk about – if not actually relevant. So we have ex-Gov Sarah Palin decrying government “death panels”, and the Republicans have called in their squads of crazies and told the lunatic fringe to be ready on standby.  Rush Limbaugh is desperately trying to convince his listeners that President Obama is the second coming of Adolph Hitler, while Glenn Beck is content to simply call President Obama a racist and a fascist.

It seems that the Republican Party and their minions are now desperately throwing everything but the kitchen sink at the health care bill that is looming in Congress.  But why? Why is the Party desperately stirring up mobs of people and baiting them with misinformation? Is it because we have moved beyond rational debate about the pros and cons of health care reform?  Apparently so.  The Republican Party has apparently decided that rational debate is useless and has decided to unleash mobs of irrational, ill-informed, emotional people in a last ditch effort to derail the Congressional bill.  The key concept here is desperation  – so evident among the mobs of mislead people who are showing up in carefully orchestrated groups at the town hall meetings across the country.  As demagogues, like Sarah Palin, add fuel to the flames, the “masterminds??” of the Republican Party have unleashed their final solution to the health care issue upon the country: Helter Skelter.

Ultimately though, the Republicans just don’t have the votes.  Despite all the lies and distortions, the name calling, the character assassinations, the idiocy that spews from the lips of Limbaugh and Beck, the wheels are not coming off.  Health care reform will be passed, and all Americans will benefit.

And before you can say Abe Lincoln, the Republicans will be taking credit for all the good things it does for the people of America.

Read Full Post »

The fundamental problem with the President’s health insurance plan is that it is an insurance plan. So what’s wrong with that?  Shouldn’t everyone be insured?  Maybe, maybe not. Everyone should be able to get their medical needs attended to in a way that they can afford, but that doesn’t necessarily equate to giving everyone an insurance card.  The problem comes down eventually to resources, both physical and financial, and whether an insurance plan can really provide the answer for health care in our country.  The problem is the nature of insurance itself.

At the present time, about 47 million people have no health insurance in the United States.  That’s about 16% of the population.  I am willing to bet that the majority of these are people who can’t afford health insurance and who do not receive routine medical care and checkups.  It is therefore likely that this segment of the population has more medical needs than the remainder of the population on a per capita basis.  So what happens when we give everybody a medical insurance card, particularly people who have never had one before?  I expect that the number of people seeking medical care will increase by 16% compared to what we have today. Actually, because I expect these new people in the system will be less healthy, let’s make that a 20% increase in people seeking access to doctors, nurses, hospitals, and medicine.  Do we really have 20% excess capacity in our health care system? Can we instantly accommodate 20% more people in our hospitals?  Can our doctors accept 20% more new patients tomorrow?  Will we have 20% more flu vaccine on hand than we usually do?  I suspect the answer is “no” in all cases.  The turn on of health care for all will result in a very large increase in demand for health care, and I don’t believe we have made the slightest preparation for it.  I don’t seem to recall hearing that we have even thought about it.

The thing that’s wrong with the President’s medical health insurance plan is that it’s an insurance plan.  Insurance is a funny thing – it’s sort of like a reverse lottery where you put your money in the pot, but you really don’t want to win.  The thing about lotteries is that while you can have a big winner or several big winners, everybody can’t win big.  That’s because everybody only puts in a dollar or two and after a while it all adds up to a million dollars – for one person that is.  It’s the same with insurance – it’s just a sort of lottery that falls apart if everybody strikes a winning number.  Like with Hurricane Andrew or Hurricane Katrina, the insurance companies just fold up and go away when everybody files a claim.  They simply can’t pay when everybody needs their help.  It’s the same with medical insurance – the insurance companies don’t expect everyone to break a leg on the same day.  But what if the swine flu turns into a deadly pandemic?  What if a major water supply becomes contaminated?  What if a major population center suffers a devastating earthquake?  What if a new disease, like AIDS or worse, begins spreading through the population?  Will our insurance program protect everybody? No.  It can’t.  It’s an insurance program and by its nature it is intended to only help a small segment of the population at any one time.  It cannot cope with medical disasters.

But what if the program is a great success and everybody gets all their recommended exams and inoculations and they all get very healthy?  That’s bad too.  Why? Because then everybody will live to be a hundred years old, exactly what happened in Japan, and the health care system won’t be able to cope with the much larger population and all the old people who have all sorts of geriatric diseases but don’t contribute a dime to the program because they are retired.

So does this mean that we can’t have a working government health plan? No.  We can indeed have a government health plan that works – it just can’t be an insurance plan.  The only government health plan that could work for everyone under all circumstances is one that is based upon the government’s wealth -like all the gold in Fort Knox for example, or something else of value that the government owns in very large quantities.  Then the government would have the means to build the necessary hospitals and hire the necessary doctors and so forth in any eventuality.  A guaranteed health plan cannot depend upon probability calculations done by an insurance company.  We have already seen, too many times, that insurance companies, like AIG, go belly up just when you need them. Government insurance would be the same.

The question is: do we have the wealth to create a solid health plan for everyone?  I suspect we do, but we would probably have to slash our wasteful military budget and use the money saved to back health care.  Maybe we could fund our future military adventures with some sort of military insurance plan! It could be a plan that could fund the occasional war, but not constant war forever and ever. Hmmm…

Ultimately, whether we actually get a workable government health plan really depends a lot on our priorities as a people  – which, I suspect, is another problem with the President’s health plan.

Read Full Post »

The simple fact is that, in the United States, unlike, say Ireland, citizens of this country are not entitled to have health care i.e. they are not entitled to be healthy.  It seems sort of strange that a country that professes to espouse other rights such life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, is blind to a right for a healthy life.  It seems that you have a right to life – just not a healthy life – if you live in this country that professes to be the leader of the free world.  You might have the right to travel wherever you like on the country’s highways, and you can get a free education in the country’s public schools, but ask for medical help without being able to pay for it, and our hospitals may just leave you to die.  If you haven’t watched Michael Moore’s documentary on our failed health system, Sicko, take a look at it, you’ll see what I mean.

Now the Wall Street Journal has joined the fight against President Obama’s attempt to create some sort of national health insurance plan.  The scare tactics have been launched once again – the ones that have been so successful in the past in preventing universal health coverage for all U.S. citizens.  But why?  Why has this New York Voice of the Wealthy come forth to speak out against health coverage for all?  Try as I might, I can come up with only two reasons for the frantic effort to prevent such a plan.  The first reason is greed.  The second reason is also greed.

Let me explain.  It’s easy to see that in order to have health care for Americans who are in the lowest income bracket that someone is going to have to pay, and it won’t be the people in the lowest income bracket. We already know they don’t have the money to pay – that, after all, is the problem! So what is the solution? Tax the rich! An eminently wise solution.  As the famed bank robber, Willie Sutton, reportedly said when asked why he robbed banks, “That’s where the money is”.  It’s the same with taxes, you tax the rich because they have all the money and, besides, the rest of us are all taxed out.  It makes perfect sense, unless you are the multi-millionaire or multi-billionaire greedy, rich, good Christian, people of this country who would much rather spend their money in Monaco, or the Maldives, or maybe Palm Beach.  OK. I guess, I can see the sense in that.  The ultra wealthy have made their money and they want to keep it.  To Hell with everyone else… Perfect sense.  Very American too, isn’t it?

But wait, there’s just one other little thing about health care – it’s big business.  Actually is massive business.  There is a lot of money you can make from people who have diseases, you know.  If you have the secret elixir that will save their life, some people will pay a fortune for it – even if it only cost you five cents to make it!  If you have the secret knowledge of delicate surgical techniques and someone needs your skill to save the life of their child – think of how much money you could make by doing a little operation!  Yes, the business of providing health care is a moneymaker and a big one.  And then of course there are the insurance companies, close relatives of the Las Vegas casino operators, they’ll take your bet that you will get sick – if you are healthy, that is.  If you are likely to get sick they’re not interested.  And if they take your bet and later on you do get sick, they quickly lose interest in you.  After all, insurance is not about helping you pay for your medical costs, its a business where the insurer is betting that, on the average you will pay them more than they will pay you. How else can they make money?  Be reasonable.  They, of course, have no interest in the government somehow covering your medical costs and you therefore just walking away from their craps table.  In fact, that scares them to death.  How are they going to make money if you don’t place your sickness bet with them?

The problem is that the rich, greedy folks who don’t want to share their money, the rich medical industry who want to stay that way, and the rich insurers who know a good bet when they see it, are terrified of any sort of national health plan.  That’s because it will cost them money.  They don’t care a bit if it helps you.  That’s why they are so eager to try to convince you that you will suffer under any sort of government health plan. Now, all the old scare tactics, that have worked so well in the past, are being deployed once again, and the lobbyists in D.C. are trying their best to pressure our representatives and succeeding as usual.  I wonder how many of our elected representatives have secret Swiss bank accounts?

The simple fact is this: you do have a right to health.  It is a fundamental human right, but the greedy rich don’t want you to have your right to health. That isn’t surprising.  They didn’t want you to have your right to education in the past either.  Nor did they want you to have the right to own land.  Nor did they want you to have the right to vote.  The greedy rich only want one thing – your money.  And these powerful people, many of whom are descendants of powerful people, who are also descendants of powerful people, are working very hard to keep this right from you.  It is time to stop listening to the lies of the greedy rich, it is time for the American people to realize we all have a right to health, just as our European and Asian cousins realized a long time ago.

The issue is not about the freedom to choose your health care provider.  It is about your right to be healthy.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: